The communications field is a broad one. It’s not just about writing and editing, but also public relations, marketing, and design. With so many different areas within communications, there are plenty of entry-level jobs in Chicago that will give you the skills and experience you need to move your career forward.
The first thing you should do when looking for an entry-level job in Chicago is research companies in the area that have a lot of jobs available. This way, you can apply for multiple positions at once, which will give you more flexibility in terms of scheduling interviews. Make sure to include any company or organization that has a website with information about their needs and culture—this will give you an idea of what types of jobs they’re hiring for at present.
If possible, try to find out if there are any internships available at these companies as well—this would be a great way to get started in the field without committing too much time or money upfront.
Once you’ve narrowed down some possibilities based on your research and personal interests, it’s time to start applying! Make sure to include samples of any writing or design work that shows off your creativity and attention to detail; this is important because it
Entry Level Jobs Chicago Communications
Development communication refers to the use of communication to facilitate social development.[1] Development communication engages stakeholders and policy makers, establishes conducive environments, assesses risks and opportunities and promotes information exchange to create positive social change via sustainable development.[2] Development communication techniques include information dissemination and education, behavior change, social marketing, social mobilization, media advocacy, communication for social change, and community participation.
Development communication has not been labeled as the “Fifth Theory of the Press”, with “social transformation and development”, and “the fulfillment of basic needs” as its primary purposes.[3] Jamias articulated the philosophy of development communication which is anchored on three main ideas. Their three main ideas are: purposive, value-laden, and pragmatic.[4] Nora C. Quebral expanded the definition, calling it “the art and science of human communication applied to the speedy transformation of a country and the mass of its people from poverty to a dynamic state of economic growth that makes possible greater social equality and the larger fulfillment of the human potential”.[5] Melcote and Steeves saw it as “emancipation communication”, aimed at combating injustice and oppression.[6] The term “development communication” is sometimes used to refer to a type of marketing and public opinion research, but that is not the topic of this article.[citation needed]
Contents
1 Definition
2 History
3 Academic schools
3.1 Catholic social change
3.2 Bretton Woods
3.3 Latin America
3.4 India
3.5 Africa
3.6 Philippines
3.7 Thailand
3.8 Participatory development communication
3.9 World Bank
4 Examples
5 Policy
5.1 Stakeholder analysis
5.2 Historical perspectives
5.3 Critiques
5.4 Development communication policy science
6 International communication
7 Risk communication
8 Policy analysis in an organizational communication
8.1 Communication and its roles in development
8.2 Communication and organizational theory
9 Interface revisited and reinforced: development communication and policy sciences
10 Culture
10.1 Participatory approach, community radio and policy development
11 Development communication and the policy sciences work together towards social change
12 Risk and disaster communication amongst the youths
13 Urban farming in cities and countries
14 Communication for development (C4D) and e-Agriculture
15 Women’s roles on development through advancing policies
16 Agenda setting
17 See also
18 References
19 Further reading
20 External links
Definition
This section has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
This section may lend undue weight to certain ideas, incidents, or controversies. Please help to create a more balanced presentation. Discuss and resolve this issue before removing this message. (July 2018)
This section may be too long and excessively detailed. (July 2018)
Nora Cruz-Quebral, PhD, in the lecture she delivered for an Honorary Doctorate at the London School of Economics, University of London in December 2011, clearly accounted that the Development Communication was first articulated on 10 December 1971 at the University of the Philippines in Los Banos (UPLB). At that time, the UPLB College of Agriculture held a symposium (in honor of Dr. Dioscoro L. Umali, a national scientist in the area of plant breeding) titled “In Search of Breakthroughs in Agricultural Development”.[7]
A recent and more encompassing definition of development communication states that it is:
…the art and science of human communication linked to a society’s planned transformation from a state of poverty to one dynamic socio-economic growth that makes for greater equality and the larger unfolding of individual potentials.[8]
Erskine Childers defined it as:
Development support communications is a discipline in development planning and implementation in which more adequate account is taken of human behavioural factors in the design of development projects and their objectives.[9]
According to the World Bank, the Development Communication is the “integration of strategic communication in development projects” based on a clear understanding of indigenous realities.[10]
In addition, the UNICEF[11] views it as:
“…a two-way process for sharing ideas and knowledge using a range of communication tools and approaches that empower individuals and communities to take actions to improve their lives.” The Thusong government center described it as “providing communities with information they can use in improving their lives, which aims at making public programmes and policies real, meaningful and sustainable”.[12]
Bessette (2006) defined development communication as a “planned and systematic application of communication resources, channels, approaches and strategies to support the goals of socio-economic, political and cultural development”.[13]: 42 Development communication is essentially participatory, because, according to Ascroft and Masilela (1994) “participation translates into individuals being active in development programmes and processes; they contribute ideas, take initiative and articulate their needs and their problems, while asserting their autonomy.”[13]
Who are development communicators? What qualities do they possess? Nora C. Quebral[14] gave a succinct characterization:
They understand the process of development, the process of communication, and the environment in which the two processes interact.
They are knowledgeable in communication skills and techniques as well as proficient in subject matter to be communicated.
They have internalized the values inherent in equity and the unfolding of individual potential.
They have firsthand knowledge of the several kinds of end-users of development communication.
They have a sense of commitment, the acceptance of individual responsibility for advancing human development.
Concepts
According to Felstehausen (1973), conventional theoretical assumptions are drawn from development communications research and are challenged on the grounds that as theoretical concepts they are inadequate guides to the selection of data and the resolution of development problems. The first conceptual fallacy results from the regular practice of choosing operational examples and analogies from the experiences of developed rather than underdeveloped countries. This is especially evident in terms of a bias favoring technology (especially U.S. technology) as a correlate to communication phenomena and as a solution to development problems. The second fallacy results from the use of inappropriate and frequently untested theoretical models within communication research causing a distorted view of the role of communication in relation to social and behavioral systems. The first issue is argued by presenting a review of empirical studies which show that communication processes and the adoption of new technology does not go on apart from the factors which define the behavior of the social, economic and political system. Correlational analyses are of little value in explaining communication processes, or in establishing their role in relation to development. The second issue is addressed by suggesting that communication is to be viewed as part of a social interaction theory in which communication is treated as a process which unveils and transforms reality in the exchange of information among persons. Communication can be defined as a process of accumulating and integrating intelligence. This reformulation shifts the research focus from questions of how communication functions to change persons (senders or receivers), to how it functions to change and transform ideas. Concepts, ideas, interests and positions can then be used as the primary units of analysis.[15]
